search Search

AWA DATABASE

Updated Eye Muscle Area WBV

Knowledge Centre

Updated Eye Muscle Area WBV

Development of the Eye Muscle Area WBV

The Eye Muscle Area WBV was developed using a revised genetic evaluation framework that reflects modern Wagyu data and production systems.  The Eye Muscle Area EBV and WBV are derived from the same phenotypic records and are expressed in the same units, but differ as a result of updated genetic parameters and higher volumes of data.

 

Wagyu-Specific Genetic Parameters

EMA WBVs are calculated using:

  • Heritabilities estimated solely from an increased Wagyu dataset
  • Updated Wagyu-specific genetic correlations
  • Full multi-trait models incorporating growth, carcase weight, and marbling traits

This allows EMA to be evaluated in a more correct biological context for Wagyu.

 

Comparison: EMA EBVs vs EMA WBVs

Figure 1. Eye Muscle Area EBV vs Eye Muscle Area WBV (All Animals)

Description:
The following scatter plot of EMA EBVs (x-axis) against EMA WBVs (y-axis) shown the relationship between EMA EBVs and WBVs across the whole Wagyu population.

A significant change in the statistical model used to calculate Eye Muscle Area WBVs results in significant change in the genetic estimate for this trait in some animals.  In general, the WBVs for Eye Muscle Area are positively correlated with EBVs, with high EBV animals tending to be high WBV animals.  However, the correlation is only 0.73, meaning that there is significant re-ranking due to the updated Wagyu-specific parameters used in calculating WBVs.

EMA WBV

Figure 1. Distribution and Correlation of Eye Muslce Area EBVs (x axis) and Eye Muscle Area WBVs (y axis) for all animals.

 

Interpretation:

  • Animals with high EMA EBVs generally remain high for EMA WBVs
  • The moderate correlation indicates meaningful re-ranking for some animals
  • Re-ranking is driven by corrected trait relationships rather than data noise

 

Improved Genetic Relationships Under WBVs

Under the new WBV model, Eye Muscle Area shows:

Trait Category Genetic Relationship
Growth traits Positive
Carcase weight Positive
Marbling score Positive

 

These relationships better reflect relationships between traits within the AWA database.

What This Means for Breeders

What Remains the Same

  • EMA remains a comparative genetic measure of Eye Muscle Area
  • Higher values indicate genetically larger eye muscle area
  • Accuracy should guide confidence in selection decisions

What Improves

  • Better alignment with observed progeny outcomes
  • Reduced bias against growth-oriented animals
  • Improved ability to select eye muscle area and growth
  • More biologically realistic rankings across the population

 

Why This Change Is Only Possible Now

The transition from EMA EBV to EMA WBV is enabled by:

  • A large increase in Wagyu-specific EMA records
  • The ability to re-estimate parameters using Wagyu-only data
  • Independent AWA genetic evaluation capability

 

Conclusion

The replacement of the Eye Muscle Area EBV with the Eye Muscle Area WBV represents a substantial technical improvement in how eye muscle area is evaluated in Wagyu cattle. By correcting trait relationships and embedding EMA within a Wagyu-specific multi-trait framework, WBVs deliver a more accurate and biologically meaningful assessment of carcase muscling.

Important Notice and Disclaimer

It is very important that you appreciate when viewing the AWA database that the information contained on the AWA database, including but not limited to pedigree, DNA information, Estimated Breeding Values (EBVs) and Index values, is based on data supplied by members and/or third parties.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information reported through AWA, AWA officers and employees assume no responsibility for its content, use or interpretation. AWA disclaims all liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages and costs you may incur as a result of the use by you of the data on this AWA database and the information supplied by ABRI and AGBU being inaccurate or incomplete in any way for any reason.

Regarding EBVs and Index values, it is very important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that:

  • EBVs are derived using Wagyu Single Step BREEDPLAN technology developed independently by the Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (AGBU), using the information contained within the AWA database.
  • AGBU is a joint venture of NSW Department of Primary Industries and the University of New England, which receives funding for this purpose from Meat and Livestock Australia Limited.
  • AWA relies solely on advice provided by AGBU and ABRI in accepting Wagyu Single Step BREEDPLAN software.
  • EBVs published in Wagyu Single Step BREEDPLAN are estimates of genetic potential of individual animals and may not reflect the raw animal phenotype.
  • EBVs can only be directly compared to other EBVs calculated in the same monthly Wagyu Group BREEDPLAN analysis.

 

Regarding pedigree and DNA testing results submitted to the AWA, it is very important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that:

  • Animals whose registration identifiers start with PED are Pedigree Recorded Animals. What this means is that the details which Australia Wagyu Association Limited (AWA) used to register the animal were obtained from a Recognised Wagyu Registry Organisation – in other words a Wagyu breed association based outside of Australia. AWA has not independently verified the information with respect to the animal or the details recorded about the animal. You should read AWA’s by-laws which sets out details regarding the definition of a Pedigree Recorded Animal.
  • Future events cannot be predicted accurately. AWA makes no statements, representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of, and you should not rely on, any information contained in the registration details of this animal or their capability to achieve any purpose. AWA disclaims all liability (including without limitation, liability for negligence) for all claims, expenses, losses, damages and costs you may incur as a result of the information set out in the registration details of this animal for any reason being inaccurate or incomplete in any way or incapable of achieving any purpose.
  • Pedigree and DNA data submitted and supplied to AWA may have errors in it which cannot be detected without further DNA testing.
  • Technology may have advanced since a particular test was undertaken so that previous inaccuracies which were not detectable are now able to be detected by current testing technology.
  • AWA estimates that less than 1% of the pedigree entries, ownership or breeding details in the AWA Herdbook may have errors or which may be misleading. For this reason, users ought to consider if they need to obtain independent testing of the relevant animal (if possible) to ensure that the data is accurate.

 

Regarding prefectural content, it is very important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that:

  • Prefectural content is based on the estimation of prefectural origin from Japanese breeding records of 201 foundation sires and 168 foundation dams. As genotype-based parent verification is not used in Japan, and full Japanese registration certificates are not available for all foundation animals, exact prefectural composition for these sires and dams cannot be validated.
  • The calculation of prefectural content for Australian Herdbook animals relies on the accuracy of pedigree records and DNA samples provided by AWA members.
  • The reporting of prefectural content for animals within the AWA Herdbook relies on the calculation provided by ABRI.

If you consider that you do not understand or appreciate the nature and extent of the data provided on this website or the EBVs of a particular animal, then AWA strongly recommends that you seek independent expert advice.

I Accept I Do Not Accept