Recent success for Taldra Cattle Co.

Big Paddock to Palate Wagyu win in Class 39C

Australian Wagyu Association CEO Dr Matt McDonagh with Robyn and Ross Shannon as they were awarded first in Class 39C – the Carcase Value competition.

Ross Shannon is a man who clearly enjoys the complexity of breeding the best Wagyu possible so to be named as the Overall Winner of the prestigious 400-day Paddock To Palate Wagyu Challenge is an achievement he cherishes. Mr Shannon and wife Robyn had two pens of seven steers entered into the Wagyu Challenge – one pen of 75 per cent Red Wagyu steers and another pen of fullblood Wagyu that took out the event. Mr Shannon said he’d spent some time since the awards last Wednesday evening analysing the performance of his Wagyu’s in the 2022 challenge.

“Despite some initial confusion, I can now confirm that our winning pen of seven steers consisted of six fullbloods and one purebred, with the pen of Red Wagyu steers (75pc) finishing in ninth place overall,” he said.

“Our winning pen finished fourth in the weight gain section, second in the carcase section, first in the carcass value section and tenth in the beef taste off section, with one steer winning the highest Individual carcase value section with $8,191.75.

“This particular steer had average daily weight gain of 1.14kg for the 400 plus days on feed and dressed 528.5 kgs with a marbling of nine.”

Overall, the winning pen had the second heaviest average carcase weight of 465.64kg, having the second highest points for fineness of marbling.

“What was most exciting was their camera marble score of 10.3 and marbling percentage of 34.8 which was the best in the entire competition,” Mr Shannon said.

Based just near the Bunya Mountains near Kaimkillenbun, the Shannons run about 220 Wagyu and Wagyu cross cows. They were a purely commercial operation until about five years ago when they purchased some fullblood heifers and decided to make them the basis of a small purebred herd.

The Shannons use IVF to match the best cows to carefully selected Wagyu semen and are delighted to have about 11 bulls coming through this year with some impressive figures. Mr Shannon said it was exciting to see Wagyu EBVs improving across the breed.

“A few years ago the breed average for marbling was about 0.8 and now it is over 1,” he said.

“Now there are bulls around with marbling EBVs in the high 2s and even the odd one of three. It’s exciting to see the progression.”

Mr Shannon said winning the 2022 RNA Wagyu Challenge would give him even more data to play with.

“While EBVs are really only a tool and guide, the great value we place on this competition that we have just been involved with is that we get actual data on our steers in terms of what they marble,” he said.

“We can then use the dams of the winning steers as donor cows for our next IVF program.”

He also said he’d continue to use a little Red Wagyu genetics in the herd.

“We started our breeding program in the 2000s and we started with Red Wagyu then,” he said.

“We value them because they have superior growth, milking ability and eye muscle area but there has been some resistance to them in the marketplace so we had tended more towards Wagyu.”

In addition to marbling, Mr Shannon said he had his sights set on carcase weight, milk and the fineness of the marbling.

“The milk issue is one that I think Wagyus have slipped on and I also took my eye off the ball a bit and some of our milk EBVs were slipping but we’ve now got access to a couple of bulls that are not only good for marbling but their heifers are also proving to be very valuable because they are coming through with good marbling and milking ability,” he said.

2022 marks the sixth year of the RNA Wagyu Challenge which incorporates a feedlot weight gain phase (20pc of total score), carcase competition (40pc), carcase value competition (20pc) and a beef taste-off (20pc) conducted by the Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries Food Science Team. The cattle were feed for 400 days at the Smithfield Cattle Company’s Sapphire Feedlot and processed at JBS Australia. The overall winning pen from the Shannon’s Taldra Cattle Co also placed first in the carcase value competition and second in the carcase competition. One steers from the pen also took out the Highest Individual Carcase Value at $8191. The Shannons largely sell their commercial steers to feedlots but also have a small but valuable partnership that sees them export some live steers to be fed in Japan.

“The (Australian) feedlots are our backbone and over the years we have developed good relationships with two or three,” Mr Shannon said.

“The live export job is only a small part of our operation but it is a very precious part because we get the feedback as the steers are graded on the Japanese system. It is a great benchmark for us to have.”

 

Class 39 – 400-day Wagyu Challenge results

 

Class 39A best weight gain
1st – McIntyre Agriculture (50pc – 1.108 ADG)
2nd – McIntyre Agriculture (50pc – 1.060 ADG)
3rd – Sefton grazing (fullblood – 1.004 ADG)

Highest Individual Weight Gain – McIntyre Agriculture (50pc – 1.198 ADG)

Class 39B Carcase
1st – Hancock Agriculture (97pc)
2nd – Taldra Cattle Co (75pc)
3rd – Hancock Agriculture (fullblood)
Reserve champion Carcase – Bar H Grazing (95pc)

Champion carcase – AA Company (fullblood)

Class 39C Carcase Value
1st – Taldra Cattle Co
2nd – Sunland Cattle Co
3rd – Hancock Agriculture

Highest Individual Carcase Value – Taldra Cattle Co

Class 39D Beef Taste-off
1st – Bar H Grazing
2nd – Hancock Agriculture
3rd – Hewitt Pastoral Enterprises

Class 39 Overall Winners
1st – Taldra Cattle Co
2nd – Hancock Agriculture
3rd – Sunland Cattle Co

 

Full ResultsPaddock to Palate 2022 winners celebrated at RNA dinner

 

First published in Queensland Country Life  August 4 2022  |  Written by Penelope Arthur

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE - Terms & Conditions


It is a condition of use of this database that you accept these terms and conditions. 

It is important that you appreciate when accessing the Australian Wagyu Association Limited (AWA) database (which may be hosted on an external website) that the information contained on the AWA database, including but not limited to pedigree, DNA information, Wagyu Breeding Values (WBVs) and Index values (together called Database Information), is based on data supplied by AWA members and/or third parties. 

Whilst sincere effort is made to ensure the Database Information is accurate and complete, to the extent permitted by law, AWA, its officers and employees, shall not be responsible for its use or interpretation, and you use the Database Information at your own risk. Please be aware of the following limitations of the Database Information.  

Regarding WBVs and Index values, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • WBVs are derived using genetic evaluation technology developed for the AWA, using the information contained within the AWA database. 
  • WBVs are estimates of genetic potential of individual animals and may not reflect the raw animal phenotype. 
  • WBVs can only be directly compared to other WBVs calculated in the same AWA genetic analysis. 

Regarding pedigree and DNA testing results submitted to the AWA, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • Animals whose registration identifiers start with PED are Pedigree Recorded Animals. What this means is that the details which AWA used to register the animal were obtained from a Recognised Wagyu Registry Organisation – in other words a Wagyu breed association based outside of Australia. AWA has not independently verified the information with respect to the animal or the details recorded about the animal. You should read AWA’s by-laws which set out details regarding the definition of a Pedigree Recorded Animal. 
  • Pedigree and DNA data submitted and supplied to AWA may have errors in it which cannot be detected without further DNA testing. 
  • Technology may have advanced since a particular test was undertaken so that genetic issues or inaccuracies which were previously not detectable are now able to be detected by current testing technology (i.e. if the animal was tested again with current technology). 
  • AWA estimates that less than 1% of the pedigree entries, ownership or breeding details in the AWA Herdbook may have errors or which may be misleading. For this reason, users ought to consider if they need to obtain independent testing of the relevant animal (if possible) to ensure that the data is accurate. 

Regarding prefectural content, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • Prefectural content is based on the estimation of prefectural origin from Japanese breeding records of 201 foundation sires and 168 foundation dams. As genotype-based parent verification is not used in Japan, and full Japanese registration certificates are not available for all foundation animals, exact prefectural composition for these sires and dams cannot be validated. 
  • The calculation of prefectural content for Australian Herdbook animals relies on the accuracy of pedigree records and DNA samples provided by AWA members.   

Regarding DNA testing and genetic condition results submitted to the AWA, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • As genetic testing results are provided by independent DNA testing laboratories at the request of AWA members, AWA relies solely on the accuracy of the reporting of genetic testing as completed by the laboratories. 
  • AWA uses GeneProb software to calculate the likelihood of pedigree animals being a carrier of genetic conditions.  This likelihood is an estimate based on the available genetic testing results. 

If you consider that you do not understand or appreciate the nature and/or implications of the data provided on this website or the WBVs of a particular animal, then AWA strongly recommends that you seek expert advice.  Note there is substantial technical information and articles on the Wagyu website to assist our members. 

AWA’s liability for any loss or damage, consequential or otherwise, suffered or incurred by you or your related business, arising directly or indirectly from your use of Database Information, to the extent permitted by law, is limited to AWA providing you with a refund for the fees paid for the service (if any), or AWA re-performing the service, where possible, at the election of AWA.  

AWA administers this database in good faith to support AWA members and the industry. AWA does not represent or warrant that the animals recorded in this database, or animals breed from them, will achieve any particular genetic or phenotype performance.


THIS DISCLAIMER HAS BEEN UPDATED AS OF 03/02/2026, PLEASE ENSURE YOU HAVE READ IT IN DETAIL