Senator Susan McDonald – The Impacts of Government Policy on Animal Agriculture

Impacts of Government Policy on Animal Agriculture

Senator Susan McDonald presenting at WagyuEdge’23

At the recent WagyuEdge’23 Conference in Sydney, Senator Susan McDonald, a prominent figure in Australian politics and a strong advocate for regional areas, delivered a thought-provoking presentation on the impacts of government policy on animal agriculture. With her deep understanding of the industry and her personal connection to her family property, Senator McDonald shed light on the challenges faced by the agricultural sector and emphasized the need for greater understanding and collaboration between policymakers and farmers. Her presentation highlighted the importance of effective government policy in sustaining and supporting animal agriculture in Australia.


Senator McDonald emphasized that a significant gap exists in the understanding of the challenges faced by businesses, particularly in regional areas, within political administration. With only 1% of the population involved in growing and processing the food and fibre we consume, it is crucial for policymakers to comprehend the intricate workings and unique needs of the agricultural sector. As an experienced senator originating from rural Queensland, Senator McDonald stressed the necessity for parliamentarians to be well-informed about the realities of rural and regional communities.

To better comprehend the implications of government policy on animal agriculture, Senator McDonald briefly outlined the process of how federal laws are made. From the introduction of a bill to its passage through both houses of parliament and subsequent signing by the Governor-General, understanding this process helps shed light on the significance of informed decision-making and the impact it has on the agricultural industry.

There is an evident knowledge gap in Parliament as Senator McDonald drew attention to the fact that many parliamentarians have very little experience in the business side of agriculture. This hinders the formulation of effective policies that consider the challenges faced by farmers. To bridge this gap, she stressed the importance of engaging with farmers and gaining first-hand insights into their experiences. An example of this was the prohibition of live export in 2011 which there has now been a long-delayed live export compensation claim which has been under review for three years. This bill was passed at the time with little understanding of the industry and how it would affect producers and small businesses throughout Australia. The abrupt closure of this market a decade ago had a profound impact on beef prices and affected producers and small businesses across Australia. She stressed the urgency of compensating those who suffered from this decision, with an estimated cost of around 1.2 billion dollars with interest building.

Senator McDonald also noted the issue of labelling plant-based products as “beef” and “chicken,” which can be misleading for consumers. Using terms traditionally associated with animal-derived products for plant-based alternatives creates an unfair advantage for these alternatives by capitalizing on the established reputation and demand for meat products. Accurate labelling is crucial to ensure transparency and fairness in the marketplace.

Senator Susan McDonald’s presentation shed light on the vital role government policy plays in shaping the future of animal agriculture. Greater engagement between policymakers and the agricultural sector is essential to address the challenges faced by farmers and ensure sustainable, quality food and fibre production in Australia. By fostering understanding and collaboration, we can work towards a future where the government’s policies align with the needs of the agricultural industry, ensuring access to high-quality, affordable food for all Australians.

Watch Senator McDonald’s full presentation on our Vimeo Video Series HERE.

Important Notice and Disclaimer

It is very important that you appreciate when viewing the AWA database that the information contained on the AWA database, including but not limited to pedigree, DNA information, Estimated Breeding Values (EBVs) and Index values, is based on data supplied by members and/or third parties.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information reported through AWA, AWA officers and employees assume no responsibility for its content, use or interpretation. AWA disclaims all liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for all expenses, losses, damages and costs you may incur as a result of the use by you of the data on this AWA database and the information supplied by ABRI and AGBU being inaccurate or incomplete in any way for any reason.

Regarding EBVs and Index values, it is very important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that:

  • EBVs are derived using Wagyu Single Step BREEDPLAN technology developed independently by the Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (AGBU), using the information contained within the AWA database.
  • AGBU is a joint venture of NSW Department of Primary Industries and the University of New England, which receives funding for this purpose from Meat and Livestock Australia Limited.
  • AWA relies solely on advice provided by AGBU and ABRI in accepting Wagyu Single Step BREEDPLAN software.
  • EBVs published in Wagyu Single Step BREEDPLAN are estimates of genetic potential of individual animals and may not reflect the raw animal phenotype.
  • EBVs can only be directly compared to other EBVs calculated in the same monthly Wagyu Group BREEDPLAN analysis.

Regarding pedigree and DNA testing results submitted to the AWA, it is very important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that:

  • Pedigree and DNA data submitted and supplied to AWA may have errors in it which cannot be detected without further DNA testing.
  • Technology may have advanced since a particular test was undertaken so that previous inaccuracies which were not detectable are now able to be detected by current testing technology.
  • AWA estimates that less than 1% of the pedigree entries, ownership or breeding details in the AWA Herdbook may have errors or which may be misleading. For this reason, users ought to consider if they need to obtain independent testing of the relevant animal (if possible) to ensure that the data is accurate.

Regarding prefectural content, it is very important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that:

  • Prefectural content is based on the estimation of prefectural origin from Japanese breeding records of 201 foundation sires and 168 foundation dams.  As genotype-based parent verification is not used in Japan, and full Japanese registration certificates are not available for all foundation animals, exact prefectural composition for these sires and dams cannot be validated.
  • The calculation of prefectural content for Australian Herdbook animals relies on the accuracy of pedigree records and DNA samples provided by AWA members.
  • The reporting of prefectural content for animals within the AWA Herdbook relies on the calculation provided by ABRI.

If you consider that you do not understand or appreciate the nature and extent of the data provided on this website or the EBVs of a particular animal, then AWA strongly recommends that you seek independent expert advice.