Senator Susan McDonald – The Impacts of Government Policy on Animal Agriculture

Impacts of Government Policy on Animal Agriculture

Senator Susan McDonald presenting at WagyuEdge’23

At the recent WagyuEdge’23 Conference in Sydney, Senator Susan McDonald, a prominent figure in Australian politics and a strong advocate for regional areas, delivered a thought-provoking presentation on the impacts of government policy on animal agriculture. With her deep understanding of the industry and her personal connection to her family property, Senator McDonald shed light on the challenges faced by the agricultural sector and emphasized the need for greater understanding and collaboration between policymakers and farmers. Her presentation highlighted the importance of effective government policy in sustaining and supporting animal agriculture in Australia.

 

Senator McDonald emphasized that a significant gap exists in the understanding of the challenges faced by businesses, particularly in regional areas, within political administration. With only 1% of the population involved in growing and processing the food and fibre we consume, it is crucial for policymakers to comprehend the intricate workings and unique needs of the agricultural sector. As an experienced senator originating from rural Queensland, Senator McDonald stressed the necessity for parliamentarians to be well-informed about the realities of rural and regional communities.

To better comprehend the implications of government policy on animal agriculture, Senator McDonald briefly outlined the process of how federal laws are made. From the introduction of a bill to its passage through both houses of parliament and subsequent signing by the Governor-General, understanding this process helps shed light on the significance of informed decision-making and the impact it has on the agricultural industry.

There is an evident knowledge gap in Parliament as Senator McDonald drew attention to the fact that many parliamentarians have very little experience in the business side of agriculture. This hinders the formulation of effective policies that consider the challenges faced by farmers. To bridge this gap, she stressed the importance of engaging with farmers and gaining first-hand insights into their experiences. An example of this was the prohibition of live export in 2011 which there has now been a long-delayed live export compensation claim which has been under review for three years. This bill was passed at the time with little understanding of the industry and how it would affect producers and small businesses throughout Australia. The abrupt closure of this market a decade ago had a profound impact on beef prices and affected producers and small businesses across Australia. She stressed the urgency of compensating those who suffered from this decision, with an estimated cost of around 1.2 billion dollars with interest building.

Senator McDonald also noted the issue of labelling plant-based products as “beef” and “chicken,” which can be misleading for consumers. Using terms traditionally associated with animal-derived products for plant-based alternatives creates an unfair advantage for these alternatives by capitalizing on the established reputation and demand for meat products. Accurate labelling is crucial to ensure transparency and fairness in the marketplace.

Senator Susan McDonald’s presentation shed light on the vital role government policy plays in shaping the future of animal agriculture. Greater engagement between policymakers and the agricultural sector is essential to address the challenges faced by farmers and ensure sustainable, quality food and fibre production in Australia. By fostering understanding and collaboration, we can work towards a future where the government’s policies align with the needs of the agricultural industry, ensuring access to high-quality, affordable food for all Australians.

Watch Senator McDonald’s full presentation on our Vimeo Video Series HERE.

IMPORTANT NOTICE - Terms & Conditions


It is a condition of use of this database that you accept these terms and conditions. 

It is important that you appreciate when accessing the Australian Wagyu Association Limited (AWA) database (which may be hosted on an external website) that the information contained on the AWA database, including but not limited to pedigree, DNA information, Wagyu Breeding Values (WBVs) and Index values (together called Database Information), is based on data supplied by AWA members and/or third parties. 

Whilst sincere effort is made to ensure the Database Information is accurate and complete, to the extent permitted by law, AWA, its officers and employees, shall not be responsible for its use or interpretation, and you use the Database Information at your own risk. Please be aware of the following limitations of the Database Information.  

Regarding WBVs and Index values, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • WBVs are derived using genetic evaluation technology developed for the AWA, using the information contained within the AWA database. 
  • WBVs are estimates of genetic potential of individual animals and may not reflect the raw animal phenotype. 
  • WBVs can only be directly compared to other WBVs calculated in the same AWA genetic analysis. 

Regarding pedigree and DNA testing results submitted to the AWA, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • Animals whose registration identifiers start with PED are Pedigree Recorded Animals. What this means is that the details which AWA used to register the animal were obtained from a Recognised Wagyu Registry Organisation – in other words a Wagyu breed association based outside of Australia. AWA has not independently verified the information with respect to the animal or the details recorded about the animal. You should read AWA’s by-laws which set out details regarding the definition of a Pedigree Recorded Animal. 
  • Pedigree and DNA data submitted and supplied to AWA may have errors in it which cannot be detected without further DNA testing. 
  • Technology may have advanced since a particular test was undertaken so that genetic issues or inaccuracies which were previously not detectable are now able to be detected by current testing technology (i.e. if the animal was tested again with current technology). 
  • AWA estimates that less than 1% of the pedigree entries, ownership or breeding details in the AWA Herdbook may have errors or which may be misleading. For this reason, users ought to consider if they need to obtain independent testing of the relevant animal (if possible) to ensure that the data is accurate. 

Regarding prefectural content, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • Prefectural content is based on the estimation of prefectural origin from Japanese breeding records of 201 foundation sires and 168 foundation dams. As genotype-based parent verification is not used in Japan, and full Japanese registration certificates are not available for all foundation animals, exact prefectural composition for these sires and dams cannot be validated. 
  • The calculation of prefectural content for Australian Herdbook animals relies on the accuracy of pedigree records and DNA samples provided by AWA members.   

Regarding DNA testing and genetic condition results submitted to the AWA, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • As genetic testing results are provided by independent DNA testing laboratories at the request of AWA members, AWA relies solely on the accuracy of the reporting of genetic testing as completed by the laboratories. 
  • AWA uses GeneProb software to calculate the likelihood of pedigree animals being a carrier of genetic conditions.  This likelihood is an estimate based on the available genetic testing results. 

If you consider that you do not understand or appreciate the nature and/or implications of the data provided on this website or the WBVs of a particular animal, then AWA strongly recommends that you seek expert advice.  Note there is substantial technical information and articles on the Wagyu website to assist our members. 

AWA’s liability for any loss or damage, consequential or otherwise, suffered or incurred by you or your related business, arising directly or indirectly from your use of Database Information, to the extent permitted by law, is limited to AWA providing you with a refund for the fees paid for the service (if any), or AWA re-performing the service, where possible, at the election of AWA.  

AWA administers this database in good faith to support AWA members and the industry. AWA does not represent or warrant that the animals recorded in this database, or animals breed from them, will achieve any particular genetic or phenotype performance.


THIS DISCLAIMER HAS BEEN UPDATED AS OF 03/02/2026, PLEASE ENSURE YOU HAVE READ IT IN DETAIL