Sustainability and profitability go hand in hand at ACC

Australian Country Choice (ACC) is the largest family-owned vertically integrated beef producer in the world.  With pristine cattle raising operations across Queensland, through to its state-of-the art export processing facility, it is a true innovation driven Australian Agricultural success story.

Part of ACC’s continual innovation and value-add has been the establishment of a Wagyu Herd in 2017 and pivot in strategy to capture increased value and profitability through production of luxury Wagyu beef to support leading global export brands.

ACC has relied heavily on genomic and production data to drive genetic selection within its Wagyu program. Ryan Carter, the Senior Manager of Southern Breeding at ACC said that “it has become increasingly apparent that continual analysis of this data, coupled with phenotypic assessment, is critical to producing a consistent and reliable product whilst continuing to grow scale of production.

ACC has been an early adopter of the Wagyu Feeder Check DNA tool developed by the Australian Wagyu Association in partnership with Neogen Australasia and CSIRO.  Ryan said that “ACC have found the Wagyu Feeder Check to be an extremely helpful tool to evaluate our terminal progeny for specific production traits, allowing for informed decision-making well before carcass results are available.”

“We have processed a total of 5,923 Wagyu X samples through the Wagyu Feeder Check and have received carcase results for 2,097, providing compelling data to back operational and production measurements. These animals range from steers killed in 2021 through to our 2023 weaners, encompassing F1 Wagyu x Angus through to high content purebred steers. Currently, Tissue Samples are collected at around 12 months of age, with results back before feeding program entry.”

The Wagyu Feeder Check is a commercially available tool that provides data on the genetic merit of Wagyu content animals for key traits including Carcase Weight, Average Daily Gain, Marble Score, Eye Muscle Area and Rump Fat.  Genetic merit scores (Molecular Breeding Values; MBVs) are provided between 1 and 10 (10 being highest) for each trait and can be obtained at or before feedlot induction to improve animal management.

Ryan said that “comparison of Kill Results with Wagyu Feeder Check MBV data on the slaughtered steers demonstrated strong correlation between the MBV Rank of each animal and their actual production outcome for each trait across the cohort”. This was best demonstrated by grouping animals by their graded/actual marble score and assessing the MBV rank from the Wagyu Feeder Check across that group.

The following graph represents the percentage of animals given an MBV 5 or lower (blue bars) and MBV 6 or higher (orange bars), at each graded marble score (AUSMeat Marble Score). In the ACC carcase data, of all carcasses that graded AUSMeat Marble Score 9, 16.05% were predicted to have lower expression of marbling as they were evaluated to have a Marbling MBV Rank of 5 or lower. Counter to this, the MBV Rank 5 and below cattle accounted for 91.74% of carcasses which marbled 3 and 92.31% of carcasses which marbled 4.

 

Wagyu content carcases that grade marble score 4 or below are estimated to cost the industry $1,000 per head on average. Prior analysis conducted by the Australian Wagyu Association suggests that removing the bottom 10% of crossbred Wagyu Feeder cattle could save the industry $22 million per year in improved resource use efficiency.

ACC have also used the Wagyu Feeder Carcase Weight rankings in a similar analysis, that shows a strong trend between achieved Hot Standard Carcase Weight to the CWT MBV from Wagyu Feeder Check was seen in the ACC data.

Grouped into 25 kilogram weight brackets, 94.12% of carcasses between 550kg and 575kg were produced by a Carcase Weight MBV Rank 6 or above animal (orange bars), as well as all four 575kg + carcasses. Of the 155 carcasses in the 500kg to 525kg group, only 12 were produced by an animal with an MBV Rank of 5 or below (blue bars) for 7.74% of the bracket.

 

Christian Coffey, ACC’s General Manager of Rural Properties described the future added value of using the Wagyu Feeder Check Tool, saying “We also receive DNA parentage information to provide precise through-chain verification of Wagyu content and to link data back to Fullblood Sires through Sire Verification.

Sires whose progeny averaged favorably in kill data analysis were also highlighted through average progeny MBV rankings. Out of 99 Sires, the top 10 by average progeny MBV Rank achieved a graded marble score average of 7.11 across 242 carcasses. In comparison, the Bottom 10 Sires achieved 5.3 across 281 carcasses.”

The MBV’s on the progeny along with the Sire Verification translates to predicted Sire performance. This can be used as part of the bull selection criteria when joinings are being decided, giving the ability to predict the potential genetic performance of a sire well in advance of kill data analysis. These sires have the potential to directly influence up to four generations of progeny. With Wagyu Feeder Check, conclusions can be drawn on the future usage of the bull before kill data is analysed.

ACC CEO Anothy Lee said “We see the Wagyu Feeder Check tool as an important improvement in sustainability of our production, by only targeting animals to the ACC Wagyu program that will achieve the high quality standards for Wagyu beef.  ACC is using this information to improve its Wagyu production supply chain, identifying low profitability animals that will not meet the requirements from long-feeding programs.”

IMPORTANT NOTICE - Terms & Conditions


It is a condition of use of this database that you accept these terms and conditions. 

It is important that you appreciate when accessing the Australian Wagyu Association Limited (AWA) database (which may be hosted on an external website) that the information contained on the AWA database, including but not limited to pedigree, DNA information, Wagyu Breeding Values (WBVs) and Index values (together called Database Information), is based on data supplied by AWA members and/or third parties. 

Whilst sincere effort is made to ensure the Database Information is accurate and complete, to the extent permitted by law, AWA, its officers and employees, shall not be responsible for its use or interpretation, and you use the Database Information at your own risk. Please be aware of the following limitations of the Database Information.  

Regarding WBVs and Index values, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • WBVs are derived using genetic evaluation technology developed for the AWA, using the information contained within the AWA database. 
  • WBVs are estimates of genetic potential of individual animals and may not reflect the raw animal phenotype. 
  • WBVs can only be directly compared to other WBVs calculated in the same AWA genetic analysis. 

Regarding pedigree and DNA testing results submitted to the AWA, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • Animals whose registration identifiers start with PED are Pedigree Recorded Animals. What this means is that the details which AWA used to register the animal were obtained from a Recognised Wagyu Registry Organisation – in other words a Wagyu breed association based outside of Australia. AWA has not independently verified the information with respect to the animal or the details recorded about the animal. You should read AWA’s by-laws which set out details regarding the definition of a Pedigree Recorded Animal. 
  • Pedigree and DNA data submitted and supplied to AWA may have errors in it which cannot be detected without further DNA testing. 
  • Technology may have advanced since a particular test was undertaken so that genetic issues or inaccuracies which were previously not detectable are now able to be detected by current testing technology (i.e. if the animal was tested again with current technology). 
  • AWA estimates that less than 1% of the pedigree entries, ownership or breeding details in the AWA Herdbook may have errors or which may be misleading. For this reason, users ought to consider if they need to obtain independent testing of the relevant animal (if possible) to ensure that the data is accurate. 

Regarding prefectural content, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • Prefectural content is based on the estimation of prefectural origin from Japanese breeding records of 201 foundation sires and 168 foundation dams. As genotype-based parent verification is not used in Japan, and full Japanese registration certificates are not available for all foundation animals, exact prefectural composition for these sires and dams cannot be validated. 
  • The calculation of prefectural content for Australian Herdbook animals relies on the accuracy of pedigree records and DNA samples provided by AWA members.   

Regarding DNA testing and genetic condition results submitted to the AWA, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • As genetic testing results are provided by independent DNA testing laboratories at the request of AWA members, AWA relies solely on the accuracy of the reporting of genetic testing as completed by the laboratories. 
  • AWA uses GeneProb software to calculate the likelihood of pedigree animals being a carrier of genetic conditions.  This likelihood is an estimate based on the available genetic testing results. 

If you consider that you do not understand or appreciate the nature and/or implications of the data provided on this website or the WBVs of a particular animal, then AWA strongly recommends that you seek expert advice.  Note there is substantial technical information and articles on the Wagyu website to assist our members. 

AWA’s liability for any loss or damage, consequential or otherwise, suffered or incurred by you or your related business, arising directly or indirectly from your use of Database Information, to the extent permitted by law, is limited to AWA providing you with a refund for the fees paid for the service (if any), or AWA re-performing the service, where possible, at the election of AWA.  

AWA administers this database in good faith to support AWA members and the industry. AWA does not represent or warrant that the animals recorded in this database, or animals breed from them, will achieve any particular genetic or phenotype performance.


THIS DISCLAIMER HAS BEEN UPDATED AS OF 03/02/2026, PLEASE ENSURE YOU HAVE READ IT IN DETAIL