Trade Policy Strengthens Outlook for Australian Wagyu Industry

Navigating Uncertainty: Trade Policy Strengthens Outlook for Australian Wagyu Industry

Australia’s beef and Wagyu sectors are navigating one of the most challenging global trade environments in decades, but strong trade policy, diversification, and resilient demand are helping position the industry for continued success. Catherine Raper in stage at WagyuEdge

Speaking at WagyuEdge’26 in April, Ms Catherine Raper, First Assistant Secretary and Australia’s Chief Negotiator Office of Global Trade Negotiations & AU-EU FTA, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, outlined how shifting global dynamics are shaping opportunities for Australian producers, and why trade policy has never been more important.

A turbulent global landscape

Catherine described a trading environment marked by conflict, supply chain disruptions, rising protectionism and volatile input costs.

“These are unpredictable conditions,” she said, pointing to disrupted shipping routes, high fuel and fertiliser costs, and geopolitical tensions, including conflict in the Middle East as key pressures affecting global markets.

Such uncertainty is compounded domestically by climate variability, from floods to dry conditions, creating a complex operating environment for producers making long-term investment decisions.

Yet amid these challenges, Catherin emphasised the critical role of government in securing “predictable market access, reducing trade barriers and creating options” for exporters.

Strong performance despite headwinds

Despite global instability, Australia’s trade performance remains exceptionally strong.

Two-way trade reached a record $1.28 trillion in 2024–25, while beef exports have surged dramatically, doubling in value from $9 billion in 2021 to $19 billion in 2025. At the same time, export volumes have climbed to around 1.5 million tonnes, reflecting robust international demand.

“Trade underpins around one in four jobs in Australia,” Catherine said, underscoring its importance to regional communities and industries like Wagyu.

Key growth has been supported by new and existing free trade agreements (FTAs), including deals with the United Kingdom and the United Arab Emirates, as well as strong demand in major markets such as the United States, China, Japan and South Korea.

The United States: a critical high-value market

The United States continues to be one of Australia’s most important and lucrative export destinations, particularly for premium beef.

Australian beef exports to the US rose by 34% in 2025, increasing from $4.4 billion to $5.9 billion, driven in part by US herd rebuilding and sustained consumer demand.

Catherine highlighted that despite ongoing shifts in US trade policy, Australian exporters have retained competitive access under the Australia–United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA).

Notably, Australian beef remains exempt from recent US import surcharge measures, reinforcing its strong market position.

“This outcome reinforces an important point, open trade and reliable supply chains work,” she said.

China: opportunity balanced with risk

China remains another vital market, particularly for premium products like Wagyu, supported by rising incomes and consumer demand for high-quality protein.

However, Catherine pointed to the introduction of a global safeguard measure on beef imports earlier this year as a reminder of how quickly market conditions can change.

While the measure applies globally rather than targeting Australia specifically, DFAT has worked closely with Chinese authorities to minimise disruption and improve transparency for exporters.

The broader lesson, she noted, is the importance of diversification.

“Trade impediments in China reinforced just how critical it is to have options in diverse markets,” she said, referencing previous disruptions affecting up to $20 billion in trade.

Diversification and new opportunities

Australia’s network of 19 free trade agreements continues to play a central role in expanding market access and reducing risk.

Existing agreements are already delivering substantial benefits:

  • Japan: Beef tariffs reducing from 38.5% to 23.5%, improving access for premium exports
  • South Korea: Tariffs down to just over 10%, with full elimination by 2028
  • CPTPP and RCEP: Expanding regional access and opening new opportunities

At the same time, Southeast Asia and other emerging markets offer growing demand driven by expanding middle classes and increasing purchasing power.

Landmark EU trade deal delivers new access

A major highlight of Catherine’s address was the recent conclusion of the Australia–European Union Free Trade Agreement after eight years of negotiations.

The agreement provides:

  • 35,000 tonnes of preferential beef access, including over 30,000 tonnes of new access
  • An estimated $580 million in annual value
  • Greater flexibility, including high-value fresh and chilled beef exports

The EU market, comprising 450 million consumers with a combined GDP of around $30 trillion, represents a significant new opportunity for Australian producers.

“This agreement fills a major gap in Australia’s trade architecture,” Catherine said, describing it as the “last missing piece” in the country’s FTA network.

Importantly, the agreement avoids additional regulatory burdens while supporting broader benefits such as lower input costs, increased two-way investment, and improved access to environmental goods.

Addressing non-tariff barriers

While tariff reductions remain important, Catherine noted that non-tariff barriers, such as complex certification processes and regulatory requirements are increasingly significant challenges for exporters.

She pointed to concerns around the EU’s deforestation regulation and Indonesia’s halal certification rules as examples where Australia continues to advocate strongly for practical, risk-based approaches.

Efforts to delay and refine such measures are aimed at reducing compliance costs while maintaining access.

The importance of a rules-based system

Catherine reaffirmed Australia’s commitment to a rules-based global trading system through institutions like the World Trade Organization (WTO), which underpins stability and provides recourse when trade rules are breached.

Australia also continues to play a leading role in pushing for fairer agricultural trade rules through forums such as the Cairns Group.

A partnership with industry

Concluding her address, Catherine emphasised that effective trade policy relies on close collaboration with industry.

“Trade policy works best when it reflects commercial reality,” she said, highlighting ongoing engagement with producers, exporters and industry bodies.

With global markets continuing to shift, she reinforced DFAT’s commitment to supporting the Wagyu and broader beef sector in navigating uncertainty while capitalising on new opportunities.

“Access to more markets through more free trade agreements is an insurance policy against disruption,” she said.

IMPORTANT NOTICE - Terms & Conditions


It is a condition of use of this database that you accept these terms and conditions. 

It is important that you appreciate when accessing the Australian Wagyu Association Limited (AWA) database (which may be hosted on an external website) that the information contained on the AWA database, including but not limited to pedigree, DNA information, Wagyu Breeding Values (WBVs) and Index values (together called Database Information), is based on data supplied by AWA members and/or third parties. 

Whilst sincere effort is made to ensure the Database Information is accurate and complete, to the extent permitted by law, AWA, its officers and employees, shall not be responsible for its use or interpretation, and you use the Database Information at your own risk. Please be aware of the following limitations of the Database Information.  

Regarding WBVs and Index values, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • WBVs are derived using genetic evaluation technology developed for the AWA, using information contained within the AWA database and parameters derived from it.
  • WBVs are estimates of genetic potential of individual animals and may change with addition of new data or with new parameters.
  • WBVs are genetic merit estimates only and may not reflect the raw animal phenotype.
  • WBVs can only be directly compared to other WBVs calculated in the same AWA genetic analysis.

Regarding pedigree and DNA testing results submitted to the AWA, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • Animals whose registration identifiers start with PED are Pedigree Recorded Animals. What this means is that the details which AWA used to register the animal were obtained from a Recognised Wagyu Registry Organisation – in other words a Wagyu breed association based outside of Australia. AWA has not independently verified the information with respect to the animal or the details recorded about the animal. You should read AWA’s by-laws which set out details regarding the definition of a Pedigree Recorded Animal. 
  • Pedigree and DNA data submitted and supplied to AWA may have errors in it which cannot be detected without further DNA testing. 
  • Technology may have advanced since a particular test was undertaken so that genetic issues or inaccuracies which were previously not detectable are now able to be detected by current testing technology (i.e. if the animal was tested again with current technology). 
  • AWA estimates that less than 1% of the pedigree entries, ownership or breeding details in the AWA Herdbook may have errors or which may be misleading. For this reason, users ought to consider if they need to obtain independent testing of the relevant animal (if possible) to ensure that the data is accurate. 

Regarding prefectural content, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • Prefectural content is based on the estimation of prefectural origin from Japanese breeding records of 201 foundation sires and 168 foundation dams. As genotype-based parent verification is not used in Japan, and full Japanese registration certificates are not available for all foundation animals, exact prefectural composition for these sires and dams cannot be validated. 
  • The calculation of prefectural content for Australian Herdbook animals relies on the accuracy of pedigree records and DNA samples provided by AWA members.   

Regarding DNA testing and genetic condition results submitted to the AWA, it is important to appreciate, and you need to be aware that: 

  • As genetic testing results are provided by independent DNA testing laboratories at the request of AWA members, AWA relies solely on the accuracy of the reporting of genetic testing as completed by the laboratories. 
  • AWA uses GeneProb software to calculate the likelihood of pedigree animals being a carrier of genetic conditions.  This likelihood is an estimate based on the available genetic testing results. 

If you consider that you do not understand or appreciate the nature and/or implications of the data provided on this website or the WBVs of a particular animal, then AWA strongly recommends that you seek expert advice.  Note there is substantial technical information and articles on the Wagyu website to assist our members. 

AWA’s liability for any loss or damage, consequential or otherwise, suffered or incurred by you or your related business, arising directly or indirectly from your use of Database Information, to the extent permitted by law, is limited to AWA providing you with a refund for the fees paid for the service (if any), or AWA re-performing the service, where possible, at the election of AWA.  

AWA administers this database in good faith to support AWA members and the industry. AWA does not represent or warrant that the animals recorded in this database, or animals breed from them, will achieve any particular genetic or phenotype performance.


THIS DISCLAIMER HAS BEEN UPDATED AS OF 03/02/2026, PLEASE ENSURE YOU HAVE READ IT IN DETAIL